IS THERE ONE VERSION OF MATRIARCHY?
The
Maiden
Gustave Klimt
OR CAN WE ACCEPT MANY?
Upon a recent reading, I would like to respond with some
thoughtful feedback on your new church which aims to promote Matriarchy within
the Celtic-Native American cultures.
PREPOSITION: Anyone who is interested or serious about
legitimate Matriarchy.
BEATA: All forms of Matriarchy are legitimate, even those which
your post labels as "Feminist-Patriarchy". In short, there is no one
"Pure" form of Matriarchy, and any group that purports to claim their
version of Matriarchy as more legitimate as someone else's without understanding
what Matriarchy entails within a multi-cultural framework will only alienate
themselves from the broader Modern Matriarchy Movement, and sets themselves
up for failure.
PREPOSITION: In our modern world many people have lost
sight of what Matriarchal society is. Most think it to be the female dominating
the male, but nothing could be further from the truth. When we think of feminine
and masculine energies and attitudes we find that masculine energy tends to
be dominating and aggressive in nature while feminine energy tends to be consultive
and passive in nature. From this it is easy to see the difference between Matriarchal
society and Patriarchal society.
BEATA: This is an inaccurate assumption that is filled with
gender stereotypes. A Matriarchal society is just as much about the expression
of female power and authority which is very active and prominent as the term
"Matriarchy" implies, the Rule of the Mothers from the beginning.
Although you may interpret Matriarchy in the manner in which seems to correspond
to your cultural beliefs, it does not mean that all Matriarchal cultures operate
according to this paradigm, nor should they.
PREPOSITION: Another miss perception is that women must
rule in and found Matriarchal systems. The idea that Matriarchy means that women
suppress men is nothing more than Feminist-Patriarchy, it is in no way Matriarchy.
BEATA: There are forms of Matriarchy that are Amazonian in
character. Again, this is part of the multi-cultural and diverse aspects that
exists among different social groups. In the earliest of human civilizations
before the advent of the growth of patriarchy, women did rule, were at the center
and top in the social order in many cultures. Men may have had some leadership
roles, but their power and legitimacy was conferred by women.
PREPOSITION: The Iroquois are a prime example of the Gender
Check and Balance System, within their system only men are allowed to hold office
and only women are allowed to vote, in essence women, as the voters, poses a
great deal of power.
BEATA: This is inaccurate as well. The Iroquois had separate
assemblies in which women and men were elected as clan leaders. The women held
veto power and could depose a Sachem which was the head tribal chief. Also the
women owned the land and houses and could dismiss their husbands at will. The
Iroquois Federation did engage in war to resolve conflicts with other Native
American tribes, and when the Europeans began to colonize the United States,
these inter-tribal conflicts increased which were related to economics and trade.
PREPOSITION: A Matriarchal Culture is most easily defined
by a society based on mutual respect of all its members and a leadership system
that bases it's decisions on the needs of the people over dogmatic principles.
Lineage is measured based upon matriarchal lines, and all
people share equal responsibility regardless of gender.
BEATA:
There is much more to a Matriarchal culture than what you have described.
There are cultures which contain elements of Matriarchy and yet are not really
Matriarchal societies. For example, matrilineal descent in which the lineage
is traced through the mother. Such a characteristic does not mean the social
group is Matriarchal, it also depends on other features of the systems of social
organization within the group. Overall, you have expressed some noble aims for
the establishment of a Matriarchal community, but again such communities will
always be diverse in nature and one has to take into consideration the historical
legacy of patriarchy and its effect on the present ways of thinking and being
of both women and men as well as on the macro social institutions in which people
interact.
Cheers, Beata February 15, 2006 |
DISCUSSIONS ON
HOME
| UPDATES
| GALLERIES
| FOUNDER
| SHOP
| INTERACT
| JOIN
US! © 2004 - 2006 RASA VON WERDER
|